REARDON: Bring Facts Not Emotion To Gun Debate

Mark Reardon (@MarkReardonKMOX)

I’m a cyclist, so let me try to use bikes for an analogy. Let’s say bikes, in general, accounted for roughly 33,000 deaths in this country every year. A little more than half of those deaths were people riding bikes who intentionally crashed them to kill themselves. But the rest of those people killed were people using their bikes to kill other people.

Now, let’s say my bike (I ride a Cannondale SuperSix EVO Hi-Mod, for those curious) killed around 350 people each year, but those deaths were particularly tragic because with my type and style of bike, people were able to take out large groups of people at a time. There’s obvious and justified outrage and the focus of the nation becomes doing whatever it takes to prevent deaths from my particular style of bike. A ban is proposed, late night talk show hosts pontificate about the dangers of that bike and they even say that cyclists who ride other types of bikes have blood on their hands if they oppose a ban on the bike in question.

But wait a second, you might be saying, why is all the attention being focused on that particular style of bike when it’s only responsible for approximately 4% of all bike murders? 33,000 people die from bikes—but we’re going to only have a national discussion and debate “common sense” bike legislation for one type of bike, even though more than 32,000 people are killed by all the other types of bikes out there? It doesn’t make sense, does it?

Mass shootings, like the one this past week in Las Vegas, are horrifying, and every time the nation has to go through a week like this, it is gut wrenching. Watching the stories of the victims and the survivors of the Mandalay Bay massacre is overwhelmingly sad, and I get sick to my stomach when I have to come on the radio to talk about what happened. I get frustrated when we all dig into our corners to once again debate the merits of gun control.

Can anything be done? I certainly would support the notion of banning bump stocks after learning this week that the sick, demented killer in Vegas used that device to modify his semi-automatic weapons into fully-automatic killing machines. But outside of that, I’ve yet to see any specific proposal or idea that would do anything to prevent a crazy person from taking dozens of lives.

It’s dishonest and misleading to insist on restrictions for one particular type of firearm without at least acknowledging that the real issue in this country, when it comes to gun-related deaths, is handguns, not assault rifles or any type of rifles for that matter. More than 33,000 people each year are killed by firearms. About half of those deaths are suicides. Only a small number—about 300-350 on any given year—come from long guns. Far more people in this country die from stabbings and fists. It’s actually not even close.

Critics are justified in pointing out that it’s no longer OK to throw up our arms and say there’s nothing we can do about it. I’m open to the idea that maybe there are some things we can do to try to prevent these mass shootings from occurring in the future. But it doesn’t make sense to make snap decisions without any consideration of the staggering number of handgun murders, particularly in urban area.

The solutions are complicated. There are no easy answers here. I understand people have their hearts in the right place and it’s easy to blame the NRA and Republicans. So let’s move forward and have that “discussion” that Jimmy Kimmel, Trevor Noah, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are demanding. But let’s do it with facts instead of emotion.

More from Mark Reardon
Comments

One Comment

  1. Errol Barnes says:

    I’ll agree in part to what Reardon is saying; however, I think he’s being clever by trying to refocus the issue from mass shootings to everyday urban crime. I think any attempt to legislate gun control in this country is a waste of time. It’s not as though the police and the government have the ability to know about every firearm on the planet and decide which ones we should get rid of. That’s a lost cause, the only way to have true gun control is outlaw private civilians from owning firearms and enacting very stiff penalties for being in possession of one. Now, with that said there will be another murder the next day and every day after such a law would go into effect. Point is there is no way to stop it, and to imply there is such a thing as gun control is Ludicrous. Even with the laws currently in place to prevent people who shouldn’t have them, they still get them. Even though this man bought his legally, criminals always find a way to get weapons of all types. Face it………GUN CONTROL is too late.

  2. Chuck Dodson says:

    Mark, spot on as the following article outlines, Gun Bans and buybacks haven’t worked in Europe the following article is a could statistical analysis demonstrating that.

    https://crimeresearch.org/2015/06/comparing-death-rates-from-mass-public-shootings-in-the-us-and-europe/

  3. banning bump stocks…. Ironic… Approved by the Obama administration….

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

More From CBS St. Louis

Shop KMOX Apparel
KMOX Podcasts
High School Spotlight

Listen Live