ST. LOUIS–(KMOX)–A plan to provide $360 million in tax breaks to help establish a China air cargo hub at Lambert International Airport is coming under fire.

The free-market think tank, the Show-Me Institute, is warning the proposal to ease the future tax burden on companies that build warehouses and other infrastructure around the airport shifts the risk from private business to taxpayers.

“If building warehouses is where the market is going right now, why wait for government assistance ?   Why wait for tax credits?” said Christine Harbin, a policy analyst with the Show-Me Institute.

Defending the Aerotropolis tax break package,  Airport Director Rhonda Hamm-Niebruegge says the Chinese are looking for a signal that the region has a “long term” committment to the China hub.

“If we don’t look at doing something to grow this airport, we’re all going to fail,” Niebruegge said, “There is not a tax dollar that is spent on this if it’s not first built, and products are going in and out, and jobs are in there.”

The Executive Director of the St. Louis Development Corporation, Rodney Crimm, also joined the discussion on KMOX.

“I think that you have to build it and they will come,” Crimm said. 

A caller to the show, Executive Vice President of Development with the RCGA, Steve Johnson, got into a heated exchange with show host Charlie Brennan on the value of tax breaks for private businesses.

“You know, why does the modern businessman,  why does the modern member of the RCGA need me to pull out my wallet to fund his business?”  Brennan said. 

“First of all, it’s not anything that’s peculiar to RCGA or St. Louis,” Johnson said, “Economic development is a very competitive business.”

The Aerotropolis plan, Senate Bill 390,  received preliminary approval from the Missouri Senate and has since been merged with a separate economic development plan, House Bill 116.   Debate continues.

Copyright KMOX

Comments (3)
  1. CWG says:

    poopoo regional growth in favor of STL wealthers & policians. STL regional sitsempty and can benefit without the hands out for tax$ to make wealthy wealthier with blue collars paying. Where is P-D comparative analysis.

  2. troy says:

    we’ve all heard ths before, taxpayers up front the $$$ first then nothing happens & we get stuck with the bill, it was called “ballpark village”

  3. not worth the risk says:

    or we spend billions on a new runway, and huge cuts are made to lambert’s air carriers flights, there is already a china hub in chigago, china really could care less if they come to StL.

    sorry it’s not worth the risk for this longshot of an opportunity

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Listen Live