Mark Reardon (@MarkReardonKMOX)By Mark Reardon

There’s been a lot of discussion this past week of addressing an anti-female bias in the music industry since female artists won just 17 of 86 categories at the Grammy Awards. I’d like to address a more pervasive bias that is becoming way too common at the Grammys … the bias against Rock ’n’ Roll.

I think Bruno Mars is awesome and one of the best performers out there right now, so I’m not taking anything away from his wins in every category that he was nominated. But rock music is in trouble, and it’s not only the Grammys that serve as a big, red flag. This year’s Coachella Valley music festival in California has no rock act among its headliners for the first time in its 19-year history.

The headliners read very similar to the Grammy nominations: Beyonce, the Weeknd, Sza, Vince Staples, Odessa, Migos and Cardi B are all headliners or featured artists. If you’ve never heard of half those artists, don’t feel bad — neither have I.

Coachella is considered one of the most prestigious music festivals on the planet and it’s stacked with rappers, DJs and R&B singers. There are a handful of alternative bands and a few lesser-known rock acts, but the lineup is primary anti-rock. I’m guessing festival organizers know what they’re doing and will sell plenty of tickets. But for those of us who love good, hard-driving rock music that features guitars instead of tracks and EDM, we’re out of luck.

Coachella, not unlike the Grammys, draws on the artists who are most popular at any given time … a musical snapshot if you will. But is it too much to ask to maybe focus on albums or bands who write songs with actual melodies?

I’m gonna sound old and crotchety here, but Kendrick Lamar, Jay-Z and Childish Gambino won’t be filling stadiums in 20 years. They probably won’t even be around in 10 years.

Springsteen, The Who, Elton John, Billy Joel, Guns N’ Roses, Metallica, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Coldplay — all acts that are multi-generational and still able to pack a house after – in some cases – four to five decades of producing music.

That doesn’t mean many of the aforementioned newer acts aren’t making great music for the times, but for those of us with listening habits that lean toward the rock end of the musical spectrum, we may be out of luck in the future. I hold out maybe a teensy, teensy bit of hope since The War on Drugs did win Best Rock Album for its brilliant record “A Deeper Understanding.”

Rock ’n’ Roll music is dead. Long live Rock ’n’ Roll!

Comments (2)
  1. I agree…why is rock dying? I’m in my early 30s and a huge Guns n Roses fan. I’m not often tempted to go to festivals as the line-ups don’t feature as many rock acts as they used to, and sometimes none at all. Luckily in the UK we still have things like the Download festival, but events like Glastonbury have become a pop/indie/electronic focused sham compared to the rock heavy heavens they used to be only 20 years ago. I just don’t understand why this is, do people just not like rock any more? I feel part of a dying breed!

  2. zerospace says:

    It’s just been a while since a super-genius has emerged from the rock world to bring everyone’s attention back to the genre. It’s coming. Someone’s going to claim the throne and spawn imitators and equally good bands. They just have to bring a new twist to it. ‘Least I like to believe.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s